I. EXTREME POVERTY, A DENIAL OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS
A. The indivisibility of the rights of the extremely poor
B. The prior responsibility of States
II. THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT ACTORS TO REALISE THE RIGHTS OF THE EXTREMELY POOR
A. The incorporation of a human and social dimension in the work of the Bretton Woods institutions
B. The integrated approach of the United Nations
C. The increasing role of players acting independently
of States
D. The practice of States
III. TECHNICAL COOPERATION
A. Action by the High Commissioner for Human Rights
B. Inter-agency action
IV. CONCLUSIONS
V. RECOMMENDATIONS
A. A world alliance against extreme poverty
B. The social impact of the policies of the Bretton-Woods institutions
C. National human rights institutions
D. Decentralization and local authorities in the fight against poverty
E. Good governance
F. The ineluctable responsibility of States
G. The right to a civil status
H. The regularization of the situation of persons without documents
I. The universal ratification of the relevant instruments
J. Microcredit
K. A minimum guaranteed income and basic social security legislation
L. Employment policies and jobs programmes for the
very poor
M. Special measures to help extremely poor women
N. Extremely poor older persons, especially women
O. The transfer of resources
P. Information and education for the poorest people concerning their rights (particularly ethnic groups)
Q. Prison systems and the extremely poor
R. The police and the extremely poor
S. Social workers and technical assistance
T. Specific targeted financial incentives
U. The effects of sanctions and armed conflicts
V. A draft declaration
|